KEY FACTS
August 2021 - The Army Board for Corrections of Military Records (ABCMR) ordered full monetary relief to the seven named Army Reserve Component Soldiers represented in Wolfing et. al. v. United States of America for the improper withholding of primary residence location Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) and Overseas Housing Allowance (OHA) entitlements (i.e., "dual entitlements").
September 2021 - Gulley et al. v. United States of America is filed in the US Court for Federal Claims to address other certain Army RC Soldiers who suffered improper and illegal withholding of housing entitlements while mobilized on active duty orders.
Who was impacted? Army Reserve Component Soldiers who were mobilized on active duty orders, who were not provided household goods transportation, who were denied on-base housing, and who were consequently denied dual housing entitlements.
I was harmed, how do I join? Start by filling out your case evaluation and a BAH specialist from Patriots Law Group will contact you with more information.
DOES THIS LAWSUIT APPLY TO YOU?
- Were you an Army Reserve Component Soldier and mobilized on military orders away from your primary residence location during 2016 to present?
- While mobilized were you denied household goods transportation to your primary duty station (PDS)?
- Upon arrival to your PDS, were you denied on-base housing?
- Did the Army require you to choose between BAH or OHA during your activation, or were you otherwise denied dual entitlements designed to cover the costs of your housing at your primary residence and PDS?
- If you were provided dual entitlements during activation, at any point did the Army require you to return some or all of these monies ?
Click Here (open in new tab on mobile devices)
